Everything that looks
good must taste good, right? My name is
Danielle, an English Literature Foodie obsessed with the presentation of good
food. I believe that the majority of the time visual representations of food
are equally, if not more, important than the taste. In Modern Cookery for Private Families, English poet and cook, Eliza
Acton suggests food is "merely to please the eye". There has always
been a strong idea that food is not only to be consumed but it has decorative
qualities.
From a young age
if the food did not look appetising there was no way it was passing my lips. I
have never been a fussy eater but I have always believed that if the food is
'ugly' then it was not going to taste nice. My happiest food memories begin
with its appearance. The 'Smiley' Sunday breakfast (below) was clearly going to
satisfy my tummy. This breakfast was not only for consumption, it was a
breakfast that needed to be seen.
The obsession
with visually satisfying food did not stop in my childhood; I enjoy the look of
well-presented food in restaurants, on cook shows and in magazines. The visual
representations of food are important for an audience in buying and cooking so
they can decide with their eyes. This is the main reason why I have chosen to
study this aspect of food.
The main questions I wish to address in this blog are:
- How does literature confirm that the look of the food is an important component?
- To what extent has representations of food in cookbooks changed and become more visual?
- Does the context of food effect how it is presented?
- Do pictures change the way we make recipes?
- To what extent has the dinner party changed since the Victorian period?
Works Cited
Acton, E. Modern Cookery for Private Families. Lewes: Southover Press. (1993)
Google Images- “Bubbling Brew”
Accessed 9/02/2015
Google Images- “I’m on a seafood
diet. I see food and I eat it.” Accessed 9/02/2015
Pinterest- "happy bacon
pancakes" <https://www.pinterest.com/pin/461126449322600269/ > Accessed 9/02/2015
No comments:
Post a Comment